Listen to the podcast. Find it on iTunes/iPod and Podcast.com. Download the transcript. Sponsor: HP.
Dana Gardner: Hi, this is Dana Gardner, Principal Analyst at Interarbor Solutions, and you're listening to BriefingsDirect.
Today, we present a sponsored podcast discussion on some deep rumblings of change in how IT
provides services and value to its many types of users.
The past several years have spurred a changing set of expectations from users as they engage with technology and services, as both consumers and workers. The sense is that they want to get as much ease of use and productivity from enterprise technology as from their smartphones, social networks, tablets, and cloud-based offerings. [Disclosure: HP is a sponsor of BriefingsDirect podcasts.]
That means that IT needs to rethink things a bit, to develop a "prosumer" strategy, whereby both the applications and services they provide to internal employees and their end-user customers increasingly bear the hallmarks of modern consumer services.
Their applications may need to behave more like apps. Their provisioning may need to be more like app stores. And self-service and intuitive adoption of new features need to be built in as primary requirements. Ease in social collaboration has become a must.
So how can IT adjust to this shift? What must they do differently, or more importantly, how must they think differently? This is the type of problem that a product or technology itself cannot address. It requires a comprehensive and methodological perspective, one that impacts consumers, business goals, and behaviors around technology use and adoption.
We're here now with an innovator and leader in HP’s Technology Consulting group to learn how enterprises can tackle and exploit such complex challenges as developing a prosumer strategy.
Please join me now in welcoming Liz Roche, a Director in the HP Technology Consulting organization. Welcome to BriefingsDirect, Liz.
Liz Roche: Thanks, Dana. Great to be here. [To connect further with Liz Roche, visit her at her micro site.]
Gardner: It seems that, not that long ago, corporations and businesses were adopting cutting-edge technology and then it would slowly trickle into homes and consumer use, usually in some sort of a watered down approach. You might remember the Bob Interface that Microsoft had. What’s changed since then, Liz?
Roche: A couple of things. First of all, when we look at the velocity of IT innovation, we look at
Moore’s Law, which originally described integrated circuits, and that the number of transistors that can be placed on these integrated circuit boards would double approximately every two years.
It has been common for us in IT to take a single data point and apply it across a broad spectrum of disciplines, but if you take that Moore’s Law notion and apply it to technology, it's unbelievably clear that the velocity of innovation continues to double and triple.
Technological singularity
In fact, there are futurists out there who believe that, at some point, this exponential improvement described in Moore’s Law will lead to something that folks are calling a technological singularity, where progress in technology occurs almost instantaneously and is rolled out to the general population.
Cutting-edge technology is no longer limited to the particular geography or location in which it’s going to be used. It’s now focused on the user and the role, and we are going to see that continue.
Gardner: We've seen some mega-trends too with mobile and ubiquitous wireless connectivity. It seems that the adoption of technology now seems to be moving at the volition of the savvy consumer, and the younger folks are growing up in ways in which they are savvy from the get-go. So there seems to be some very large cultural, global trends that are also supporting this.
Roche: Absolutely. If we look at some of the economic trends, you'll start to see that folks who went to college 20 or 30 years ago got out of school with the expectation of working their way up a corporate ladder and adopting technology and tools that were provided by the corporation. The folks who are coming up these days have been weaned on technology.
A really big mega-trend is that our workers of today and tomorrow, not us who are already in the workplace, those folks coming up, are going to not just demand technology that will enable their work and their life, but they will expect it and indeed may not be able to function as well without it.
Mega-trends include the consumerization of IT. At HP, we're calling it the Instant-On
Enterprise, where everything and everyone is connected. Immediate gratification and instantaneous results are mandatory. There is this notion of 24×7, always-on commerce. We could go on and on, but I think the big trends are in that general category, at least as pertains to the prosumer.
Gardner: Then, of course, there are also economic shifts. There's been a lot of venture capital directed at applications and services that are consumer-oriented. We've certainly seen tremendous uptake on the social networks by consumers.
So, the application becomes a business for many of these newer companies, and they can move very quickly. They want to be first to market. They want to carve out large market share, and that also accelerates things like social networks, sharing of photos, entertainment streams, and so on.
How do you see the economics of this shifting and pushing the adoption patterns that enterprises need to try to catch up to?
Roche: It's funny, because in many ways it has become a numbers game. Some of these applications or businesses price their products at low or no cost -- with the objective being conversion to paid, either subscriptions or paid services and advertising, but also the value of the connection, the value of the social network as part of the business model.
Shared knowledge
Organizations or enterprises today are going to be taking philosophies like that and applying it to more traditional goods and services in the marketplace, where the value isn't necessarily on the initial transactions. It’s not about a 99-cent Angry Birds [app]. It's about what happens once you're using the technology, the product, the service, the relationships that you form, the advertising, and the knowledge that can be shared.
Gardner: So we have this cauldron of bubbling and churning change, and of course shifts like this can offer terrific opportunity, as we have seen from some companies that have come into markets and been very successful very quickly. Facebook certainly comes to mind. There's also, of course, challenges, and perhaps peril, when shifts happen and you don't react to them properly.
We have now enterprises looking at these shifts, looking at how consumer and business technology adoption patterns are merging, melding, or at least certainly have a more complex relationship than in the past. What is it that you think organizations need to try to do in order to be on that advantageous side of shifts, rather than at a disadvantage?
Roche: A bunch of things. Let's start with the big picture. Organizations that are truly instant-on enterprises are those that serve their constituents, customers, employees, partners with whatever they want and need instantly, at any point in time, through any channel. So organizations that are instant-on, and those are the kinds of organizations that we need to evolve to, are going to explore better ways to run business and government by designing new process and methods, by building flexible systems that interact with greater personalization.
I think back to 10 or 15 years ago, when we were talking about mass customization and the science fiction world that was all about personalization of every transaction and every purchase. Companies are going there. I think companies will also need to look at frameworks for transacting efficiently and securely.
Creating a framework for this instant-on enterprise will enable this whole idea of everybody on, and the prosumer, the professional, and the consumer coming together as one person, one view, with two different sides to them, two worlds.
Governance is going to become ever more important. There are certainly legal and ethical goals and constraints. Creating a framework for this instant-on enterprise will enable this whole idea of everybody on, and the prosumer, the professional, and the consumer coming together as one person, one view, with two different sides to them, two worlds. That's going to have to be where organizations move to support.
Gardner: I suppose as we see these two worlds, consumer and business or professional, we certainly don't want to have to create distinct infrastructures to support those activities. It's certainly a time for convergence and consolidation as well. So we look for a more common and extensible infrastructure to support all of these activities.
The other thing that struck me by what you are saying is that this needs to be inclusive. It's not just a technology equation. It's business, culture, behavior, demographics, and localization -- really a complex undertaking. Help me understand about how you at HP are looking at this. It seems to be a terrific opportunity.
Roche: HP has a long, very cool history of being really innovative, but at HP today, our vision is to provide seamless and context-aware experiences for this connected world.
We're in a particularly interesting time and place to provide this to our customers, because we are going through it ourselves, both internally -- as an employee I can see it -- but also in how we interact with our customers, our partners, and all our constituents. [To connect further with Liz Roche, visit her at her micro site.]
Not just about prosumers
Just by way of example, at HP it's not just about prosumers, folks like me doing personal activities during work hours and work during personal hours. It's about these personal activities evolving into becoming work activities.
I'm not just messing around on YouTube because I like looking at the latest videos. I'm working You Tube, because that's where our HP Channel is. It’s one of the places where our HP Channel lives and it's one of the ways that I communicate with my clients. The same thing with Twitter and Facebook, and indeed even this podcast, speaking with you. These are prime examples of things that we at HP place a very high value on and our technology infrastructure has been overhauled to support that.
The other interesting thing about HP being well-positioned to do this is that we have a depth and breadth of both services and products that meet almost every requirement of this new instant-on enterprise.
Certainly, we would never expect to see an HP-only environment. We are very, very focused on what's right for our clients and our customers. But, the fact that I can reach back into my toolkit of HP brain power and HP Labs and our various products and service units and gain access to the information and the mind share that my clients need, is a hugely valuable tool to have at my disposal.
Gardner: Clearly, HP has a large portfolio, terrific global reach, lots of technology, and as you point out, crosses the boundary and barrier between consumer activities and business activities. But, what about the technology consulting organization, how does that come to bear on these sorts of problems, on making a shift to a more prosumer thinking and approach to IT?
The way our services are structured, we're designed to meet the various needs of transforming to an instant-on enterprise.
Roche: Let's talk a little bit about what all clients should look for in a consulting organization.
The way our services are structured, we're designed to meet the various needs of transforming to an instant-on enterprise, I mean that is the entire backbone of how we have structured ourselves.
If you look at our Converged Infrastructure team, for example, we have folks who are not only designing services to support a converged infrastructure, but we have folks who are looking at helping organizations create a transformation vision for what it means, how to get there, what your roadmaps need to look like, or how mature are you as an organization.
One of the things that we like to do a lot and, in fact, anyone considering working with a consulting partner should look for this as well, is to help folks understand their own maturity. I'm not talking about the traditional capability maturity model. We certainly we can do that, but we like to look at things in a slightly different way. We like to look at organizational culture and the risk profile of that organization. That’s unique to how we work at HP.
If I look at an organizational maturity model, we're looking at where culturally folks are going to be placed in terms of how they want to take a risk. Are they a science-fiction type organization where they're comfortable being on the bleeding edge, extremely early adopter organizations.
I've got this taxonomy in my brain from way back when I was an industry analyst and we used to talk about future organizations, which are these early adopter IT organizations, not bleeding edge, but willing to be early adopters.
Broker of services
There are the folks that are in the mainstream, and then there are the stalled IT organizations that look to deliver IT support, rather than moving to enable the business with IT and to have a seat at the table and to be not just a provider but an actual broker of services.
When you're a broker of IT services, which is what we teach our clients to be, you are providing not just IT support, but you're also providing new cost models for business process enablement. You're looking at things like service delivery in one of three ways: traditional, which is in-house or outsourced, private cloud, public cloud.
At HP Consulting, we believe that you're driving to create a service portfolio that drives a value chain. And the value chain delivers these services to the consumer, customer, citizen, via whatever channel is most appropriate -- web, chat, IM, etc.
Gardner: I suppose too, Liz, when you focus this problem set through a consultative solution or methodology, you're also going to gain the experience of what those consultants have found in other regions of the world, or industry to industry, or from having worked in a consumer environment, to then taking that into a business environment.
That’s something you don’t get from technology alone. It’s really experiential, a tribal knowledge. It seems to me that the consultative function is perhaps more important when we come into this period of change that we are facing now than almost any other.
We've been working really hard to make sure that we share our experiences, and to capture that tribal knowledge, to systematically input it into places where others can access it.
Roche: It’s one of the things that is pervasive throughout HP Consulting, that it really takes a village to deliver services and top-notch innovation to our clients.
Every time I walk into a client site with a team of consultants, it’s not just one of us working independently in our area of specialty. It’s about all of us working together. It’s about that tribal knowledge.
We've been working really hard to leverage the innovation in the field. So we need a really strong knowledge management capability. We've been working really hard to make sure that we share our experiences, and as you say, through tribal knowledge, to capture that tribal knowledge, to systematically input it into places where others can access it. And, of course, all while respecting the privacy and the non-disclosures we have with our clients.
When I walk into a healthcare organization to start working on a digital hospital activity, let's say, I've got the knowledge of all the folks who have come before me, including our long history of innovations.
The bottom line is that if someone says to me, what's very different and special about your team walking in versus someone else's team walking in, I'm going to say it is the depth and breadth of HP that's behind me, including the way that we work with our customers and partner with our clients to bring the depth and breadth of HP to bear in every engagement.
Gardner: So we're crossing chasm of consumer to business. We're crossing chasms of sourcing with cloud versus on-premises, and we're certainly looking at the difference that a consultative understanding of the processes and the technology, so crossing the chasm of business issues and IT issues.
That's nothing new. We've seen that, but it just seems to me that the stakes are higher now, and that people need to be treated as people. This is not a matter of throwing a data center over the wall and saying, "Here, good luck with that." You really need to have almost a behavioral, empathetic, sympathetic approach to bringing people into change. It's not easy to change.
Resistance to change
Roche: No, it's not. And while it may seem a little trite to say it, if anything is going to derail a project, it's going to be resistance to change, lack of a good change management strategy, and lack of executive support and governance.
The cool thing about this whole instant-on enterprise approach that we are taking is that we do actually have a taxonomy for change, and the taxonomy is both social and technology, and it basically is a way to connect all these different constituents to meet their needs.
The taxonomy itself says, if you're going to transform to an instant-on enterprise, the first level of the taxonomy is looking at the business and government requirements. Within IT, the best practice today seems to be all about alignment, business IT alignment.
We think that it's really not about alignment, but it's about taking that next step towards empowerment and empowering the business with IT. That means becoming a strategic service broker. That's the third level of this taxonomy.
To be a strategic service broker, you need to look at disciplines like converged infrastructure, security, information optimization, application and infrastructure transformation, and look to deliver those through those three service delivery mechanisms we spoke of earlier -- public cloud, private cloud, or traditional delivery, which includes outsourcing. Build those up into a service portfolio and roll it out in terms of services that are delivered.
We do actually have a taxonomy for change, and the taxonomy is both social and technology.
If you group this whole thing together, you're looking at a hybrid delivery capability, where there is no one-size-fits-all for every organization, but the taxonomy acts as a map and a rallying point to get to this idea of everybody on and supporting the prosumer. [To connect further with Liz Roche, visit her at her micro site.]
Gardner: How about some examples of how this can work when it's pulled together properly, when you have the alignment of services, consulting, technology, business buy-in, and so forth? I know that you've had experience within HP doing this yourselves, but what about outside examples? Maybe you can’t name the companies, but maybe the industries or at least the use case scenarios where this is working?
Roche: We actually have several great success stories with clients and I'm going to start with one client, Black & Veatch. We worked with them recently to deploy a unified communications solution from Microsoft that, for them, is going to pay for itself in 18 months, which is pretty amazing when you consider that we did this, basically creating a virtual environment to help Black & Veatch solve their client’s problems.
We worked with the client to design a unified communications solution and configure the architecture. We set up an infrastructure, including servers and load balancers and the like. We tested our Unified Communications software and voice, and we obviously are using voice over IP (VoIP).
We did all sorts of enhanced service desk and helpdesk implementations. And we also provided our own helpdesk -- or we set one up for them that was staff by HP to resolve issues during the cut-over. We did lots of training to help the users adapt to the new systems.
Reduced risk
After we put in place new converged technologies like IM and Mobile Access and desktop sharing, we replaced their phone system, and we gave them integrated fax and voicemail and email. We ended up reducing the risk of their outages through lots of built-in redundancies. We did this all in about 20 weeks.
As I said, they expect this project will pay for itself in 18 months, and essentially we gave Black & Veatch the ability to communicate and collaborate internally and with their customers around the world.
We worked with another client recently as well to provide them digital healthcare and digital hospital capabilities, that included things like video, telemedicine, that included the converged infrastructure to support voice and IM and other things like that.
We also worked with them to provide automated client case-management technology. I'm speculating a little bit, because some of the decisions haven’t totally been made, but imagine nurses walking into patient rooms carrying HP TouchPads, for example, rather than lugging the big heavy carts that nurses today do when they are doing automated medical records. It's really cool stuff like that, but again speaks to the whole nature of the prosumer.
We're working with education, a couple of education organizations, and in one instance working with some speech therapists to use tablet devices and handheld devices to help students with speech problems throughout their therapy. Rather than use flash cards, they're using specially built software that students can touch and listen to and things like that. Again, it's this integration of consumer and professional capabilities.
The idea that you have is provisioning that might look like app stores. Applications might look like apps on your device.
Gardner: Those are some really concrete examples of what’s happening and how the user is sort of empowered. I think we're going to see more of this of course.
Are there any harbingers of where you see the trends pointing us in terms of how technology and methodology consulting come together? One of the big things of course with the economy still being tough in many regions is how to do more with less. Is there a continuing economic incentive or I suppose even an engine of adoption that we should expect in the future, Liz?
Roche: Absolutely. In fact, I might even go so far as to call it an economic imperative. You talk about a harbinger of things to come, and I would say look at this whole reemergence of this prosumer trend. When I say reemergence, I'm talking about back in the '80s when Alvin Toffler first made up the idea that there is a convergence. He wasn’t calling it a professional, but he was calling it a producer and a consumer.
If we take that and look at how it has evolved into this notion that one person with a separate consumer and professional life is over and that we are looking for convergence, that’s the harbinger. The idea that you have, as you said in your introduction, provisioning that might look like app stores. Applications might look like apps on your device.
But as we see technology continue to increase in its velocity, as we see more and more technology adopted into our homes earlier and more deeply embedded into everything we do. That’s where we are going to see the future go.
Tight integration
Just think for a minute about our pets. We're embedding our pets with microchips that have not just their name and their address, but maybe if they have got some medical risks, they are on there.
I think we are going to start seeing things like that, that tight integration, maybe not embedded in our bodies, but certainly medical records, certainly integrated payment devices, the idea that paper money goes away and we have one card that does every thing. Organizations that aren’t at least thinking in that direction are really going to miss the boat.
Gardner: In any event, it certainly sounds like whatever steps you take today will have a greater impact because this is an ongoing effect. I don’t see any end in sight to the tremendous amount of change that we're facing. I'm sure that these are going to be ongoing discussions.
I want to thank our guest today. We have been here with Liz Roche, a Director in the HP Technology Consulting Organization. Thanks so much, Liz.
Roche: Thanks, Dana. It was an absolute pleasure to be here.
Gardner: And I want to thank our audience for joining us for this sponsored podcast discussion. This is Dana Gardner, Principal Analyst at Interarbor Solutions. You've listening to BriefingsDirect. Thanks, and come back next time.
To connect further with Liz Roche, visit her at her micro site.
Listen to the podcast. Find it on iTunes/iPod and Podcast.com. Download the transcript. Sponsor: HP.
Transcript of a BriefingsDirect podcast on how rapid changes in consumer technology use are finding their way into enterprise IT. Copyright Interarbor Solutions, LLC, 2005-2011. All rights reserved.
You may also be interested in:
- HP's eye on Autonomy means it sidesteps RDB and middleware in favor of enterprise information infrastructure
- HP Discover Interview: Security Evangelist Rafal Los on Balancing Risk and Reward Amid Consumerization of IT
- HP delivers applications appliance solutions that leverage converged infrastructure for virtualization, data management
- HP takes plunge on dual cloud bursting: public and-or private apps support comes of age
- HP rolls out EcoPOD modular data center, provides high-density converged infrastructure with extreme energy efficiency
No comments:
Post a Comment