Listen to the podcast. Find it on iTunes. Get the mobile app. Download the transcript. Sponsor: Hewlett Packard Enterprise.
Dana Gardner: Welcome to the next edition of the
BriefingsDirect Voice of the Customer podcast series. I’m Dana Gardner, Principal Analyst at Interarbor Solutions, your host and moderator for this
ongoing discussion on digital transformation success stories. Stay with us now
to learn how agile businesses are fending off disruption -- in favor of
innovation.
Our next
thought leader interview examines how DreamWorks Animation is building a multipurpose,
all-inclusive, and agile data center capability. We’ll now learn why a new era
of responsive and dynamic IT infrastructure is demanded, and how one
high-performance digital manufacturing leader aims to get there sooner rather
than later.
Here to
describe how an entertainment industry innovator leads the charge for bleeding-edge
IT-as-a-service capabilities is Jeff Wike, CTO of DreamWorks Animation in
Glendale, California. Welcome, Jeff.
 |
| Wike |
Jeff Wike: Thank you for having me.
Gardner: Tell us why the older way of doing
IT infrastructure and hosting apps and data just doesn't cut it anymore. What
has made that run out of gas?
Wike: You have
to continue to improve things. We are in a world where technology is advancing at
an unbelievable pace. The amount of data, the capability of the hardware, the intelligence
of the infrastructure are coming. In order for any business to stay ahead of
the curve -- to really drive value into the business – it has to continue to
innovate.
Gardner: IT has become more pervasive in
what we do. I have heard you all refer to yourselves as digital manufacturing. Are the demands of your industry also a
factor in making it difficult for IT to keep up?
Wike: When I
say we are a digital manufacturer, it’s because we are a place that
manufacturers content, whether it's animated films or TV shows; that content is
all made on the computer. An artist sits in front of a workstation or a monitor,
and is basically building these digital assets that we put through simulations
and rendering so in the end it comes together to produce a movie.
That's all
about manufacturing, and we actually have a pipeline, but it's really like an
assembly line. I was looking at a slide today about Henry Ford coming up with
the first assembly line; it's exactly what we are doing, except instead of
adding a car part, we are adding a character, we’re adding a hair to a
character, we’re adding clothes, we’re adding an environment, and we’re putting
things into that environment.
We are
manufacturing that image, that story, in a linear way, but also in an iterative
way. We are constantly adding more details as we embark on that process of
three to four years to create one animated film.
Gardner: Well, it also seems that we are now
taking that analogy of the manufacturing assembly line to a higher plane,
because you want to have an assembly line that doesn't just make cars -- it can
make cars and trains and submarines and helicopters, but you don't have to
change the assembly line, you have to adjust and you have to utilize it
properly.
So it seems
to me that we are at perhaps a cusp in IT where the agility of the infrastructure and its responsiveness to your workloads and demands is better
than ever.
Greater creativity, increased efficiency
Wike: That's true. If you think about this
animation process or any digital manufacturing process, one issue that you have
to account for is legacy workflows, legacy software, and legacy data formats --
all these things are inhibitors to innovation. There are a lot of tools. We
actually write our own software, and we’re very involved in projects related to
computer science at the studio.
We’ll ask
ourselves, “How do you innovate? How can you change your environment to be able
to move forward and innovate and still carry around some of those legacy
systems?”
How HPE Synergy
Infrastructure Operations
And one of
the things we’ve done over the past couple of years is start to re-architect
all of our software tools in order to take advantage of massive multi-core processing to try to give artists interactivity into their creative process.
It’s about iterations. How many things can I show a director, how quickly can I
create the scene to get it approved so that I can hand it off to the next
person, because there's two things that you get out of that.
One, you
can explore more and you can add more creativity. Two, you can drive
efficiency, because it's all about how much time, how many people are working
on a particular project and how long does it take, all of which drives up the costs.
So you now have these choices where you can add more creativity or -- because
of the compute infrastructure -- you can drive efficiency into the operation.
So where
does the infrastructure fit into that, because we talk about tools and the
ability to make those tools quicker, faster, more real-time? We conducted a project
where we tried to create a middleware layer between running applications and the
hardware, so that we can start to do data abstraction. We can get more mobile
as to where the data is, where the processing is, and what the systems
underneath it all are. Until we could separate the applications through that
layer, we weren’t really able to do anything down at the core.
Core flexibility, fast
We want to be able to change how we are using that infrastructure -- examine usage patterns, the workflows -- and be able to optimize.
Now that we have done that, we are attacking the core. When
we look at our ability to replace that with new compute, and add the new templates
with all the security in it -- we want that in our infrastructure. We want to
be able to change how we are using that infrastructure
-- examine usage patterns, the workflows -- and be able to optimize.
Before, if
we wanted to do a new project, we’d say, “Well, we know that this project takes
x amount of infrastructure. So if we want to add a project, we need 2x,” and
that makes a lot of sense. So we would build to peak. If at some point in the
last six months of a show, we are going to need 30,000 cores to be able to
finish it in six months, we say, “Well, we better have 30,000 cores available,
even though there might be times when we are only using 12,000 cores.” So we
were buying to peak, and that’s wasteful.
What we
wanted was to be able to take advantage of those valleys, if you will, as an opportunity
-- the opportunity to do other types of projects. But because our
infrastructure was so homogeneous, we really didn't have the ability to do a
different type of project. We could create another movie if it was very much
the same as a previous film from an infrastructure-usage standpoint.
By now having
composable, or software-defined infrastructure,
and being able to understand what the requirements are for those particular
projects, we can recompose our infrastructure -- parts of it or all of it -- and
we can vary that. We can horizontally scale and redefine it to get maximum use
of our infrastructure -- and do it quickly.
Gardner: It sounds like you have an assembly
line that’s very agile, able to do different things without ripping and
replacing the whole thing. It also sounds like you gain infrastructure agility
to allow your business leaders to make decisions such as bringing in new types
of businesses. And in IT, you will be responsive, able to put in the apps,
manage those peaks and troughs.
Does having
that agility not only give you the ability to make more and better movies with
higher utilization, but also gives perhaps more wings to your leaders to go and
find the right business models for the future?
Wike: That’s absolutely true. We
certainly don't want to ever have a reason to turn down some exciting project
because our digital infrastructure can’t support it. I would feel really bad if
that were the case.
In fact,
that was the case at one time, way back when we produced Spirit: Stallion of the Cimarron. Because it was such a big movie from a consumer
products standpoint, we were asked to make another movie for direct-to-video. But
we couldn't do it; we just didn’t have the capacity, so we had to just say, “No.”
We turned away a project because we weren’t capable of doing it. The time it
would take us to spin up a project like that would have been six months.
The world
is great for us today, because people want content -- they want to consume it on
their phone, on their laptop, on the side of buildings and in theaters. People are
looking for more content everywhere.
Yet projects
for varied content platforms require different amounts of compute and
infrastructure, so we want to be able to create content quickly and avoid building
to peak, which is too expensive. We want to be able to be flexible with infrastructure in order to take advantage of those
opportunities.
HPE Synergy
Infrastructure Operations
Gardner: How is the agility in your infrastructure
helping you reach the right creative balance? I suppose it’s similar to what we
did 30 years ago with simultaneous engineering, where we would design a
physical product for manufacturing, knowing that if it didn't work on the
factory floor, then what's the point of the design? Are we doing that with
digital manufacturing now?
Artifact analytics improve usage, rendering
We always look at budgets, and budgets can be money budgets, they can be rendering budgets, they can be storage budgets, and networking -- all of those things are commodities that are required to create a project.
Wike: It’s interesting that you mention
that. We always look at budgets, and budgets can be money budgets, it can be
rendering budgets, it can be storage budgets, and networking -- I mean all of
those things are commodities that are required to create a project.
Artists,
managers, production managers, directors, and producers are all really good at
managing those projects if they understand what the commodity is. Years ago we
used to complain about disk space: “You guys are using too much disk space.”
And our production department would say, “Well, give me a tool to help me
manage my disk space, and then I can clean it up. Don’t just tell me it's too
much.”
One of the initiatives
that we have incorporated in recent years is in the area of data analytics. We re-architected our software and
we decided we would re-instrument everything. So we started collecting
artifacts about rendering and usage. Every night we ran every digital asset
that had been created through our rendering, and we also collected analytics
about it. We now collect 1.2 billion artifacts a night.
And we
correlate that information to a specific asset, such as a character, basket, or
chair -- whatever it is that I am rendering -- as well as where it’s located, which
shot it’s in, which sequence it’s in, and which characters are connected to it.
So, when an artist wants to render a particular shot, we know what digital
resources are required to be able to do that.
One of the things
that’s wasteful of digital resources is either having a job that doesn't fit
the allocation that you assign to it, or not knowing when a job is complete. Some
of these rendering jobs and simulations will take hours and hours -- it could
take 10 hours to run.
At what
point is it stuck? At what point do you kill that job and restart it because
something got wedged and it was a dependency? And you don't really know, you
are just watching it run. Do I pull the plug now? Is it two minutes away from
finishing, or is it never going to finish?
Just the facts
Before, an artist would go in every night and conduct a test render. And they would say, “I think this is going to take this much memory, and I think it's going to take this long.” And then we would add a margin of error, because people are not great judges, as opposed to a computer. This is where we talk about going from feeling to facts.
So now we
don't have artists do that anymore, because we are collecting all that
information every night. We have machine learning that then goes in and determines
requirements. Even though a certain shot has never been run before, it is very
similar to another previous shot, and so we can predict what it is going to
need to run.
By doing that machine learning and taking the guesswork out of the allocation of resources, we were able to save 15 percent of our render time, which is huge.
Now, if a job is stuck, we can kill it with confidence. By
doing that machine learning and taking the
guesswork out of the allocation of resources, we were able to save 15 percent
of our render time, which is huge.
I recently listened
to a gentleman talk about what a difference of 1 percent improvement
would be. So 15 percent is huge, that's 15 percent less money you have to
spend. It's 15 percent faster time for a director to be able to see something.
It's 15 percent more iterations. So that was really huge for us.
Gardner: It sounds like you are in the
digital manufacturing equivalent of working smarter and not harder. With more
intelligence, you can free up the art, because you have nailed the science when
it comes to creating something.
Creative intelligence at the edge
Wike: It's interesting; we talk about
intelligence at the edge and the Internet of Things (IoT), and that sort of thing. In
my world, the edge is actually an artist. If we can take intelligence about
their work, the computational requirements that they have, and if we can push
that data -- that intelligence -- to an artist, then they are actually really,
really good at managing their own work.
It's only a
problem when they don't have any idea that six months from now it's going to
cause a huge increase in memory usage or render time. When they don't know
that, it's hard for them to be able to self-manage. But now we have artists who
can access Tableau reports everyday and see exactly
what the memory usage was or the compute usage of any of the assets they’ve
created, and they can correct it immediately.
On Megamind, a film DreamWorks
Animation released several years ago, it was prior to having the data analytics
in place, and the studio encountered massive rendering spikes on certain shots.
We really didn't understand why.
After the
movie was complete, when we could go back and get printouts of logs to analyze,
we determined that these peaks in rendering resources were caused by his watch.
Whenever the main character’s watch was in a frame, the render times went up. We
looked at the models, and well-intended artists had taken a model of a watch and
every gear was modeled, and it was just a huge, heavy asset to render.
But it was too
late to do anything about it. But now, if an artist were to create that watch
today, they would quickly find out that they had really over-modeled that watch.
We would then need to go in and reduce that asset down, because it's really not
a key element to the story. And they can do that today, which is really great.
HPE Synergy
Infrastructure Operations
Gardner: I am a big fan of animated films,
and I am so happy that my kids take me to see them because I enjoy them as much
as they do. When you mention an artist at the edge, it seems to me it’s more
like an army at the edge, because I wait through the end of the movie, and I
look at the credits scroll -- hundreds and hundreds of people at work putting
this together.
So you are
dealing with not just one artist making a decision, you have an army of people.
It's astounding that you can bring this level of data-driven efficiency to it.
Movie-making’s mobile workforce
If you capture information, you can find so many things that we can really understand better about our creative process to be able to drive efficiency and value into the entire business.
Wike: It becomes
so much more important, too, as we become a more mobile workforce.
Now it
becomes imperative to be able to obtain the information about what those
artists are doing so that they can collaborate. We know what value we are really
getting from that, and so much information is available now. If you capture it,
you can find so many things that we can really understand better about our
creative process to be able to drive efficiency and value into the entire business.
Gardner: Before we close out, maybe a look
into the crystal ball. With things like auto-scaling and composable infrastructure, where do we go next with computing infrastructure? As you say,
it's now all these great screens in people's hands, handling high-definition, all
the networks are able to deliver that, clearly almost an unlimited opportunity
to bring entertainment to people. What can you now do with the flexible, efficient, optimized infrastructure? What should we expect?
Wike: There's an explosion in content and
explosion in delivery platforms. We are exploring all kinds of different
mediums. I mean, there’s really no limit to where and how one can create great
imagery. The ability to do that, the ability to not say “No” to any project
that comes along is going to be a great asset.
We always
say that we don't know in the future how audiences are going to consume our
content. We just know that we want to be able to supply that content and ensure
that it’s the highest quality that we can deliver to audiences worldwide.
Gardner: It sounds like you feel confident
that the infrastructure you have in place is going to be able to accommodate
whatever those demands are. The art and the economics are the variables, but
the infrastructure is not.
Wike: Having a software-defined
environment is essential. I came from the software side; I started as a
programmer, so I am coming back into my element. I really believe that now that
you can compose infrastructure, you can change things with software without
having to have people go in and rewire or re-stack, but instead change on-demand.
And with machine learning, we’re able to learn what those demands are.
I want the computers to actually optimize and compose themselves so that I can rest knowing that my infrastructure is changing, scaling, and flexing in order to meet the demands of whatever we throw at it.
I want the computers to actually optimize and compose themselves so that I can rest knowing
that my infrastructure is changing, scaling, and flexing in order to meet the
demands of whatever we throw at it.
Gardner: I’m afraid we’ll have to leave it
there. We have been examining how DreamWorks Animation is building a
multipurpose, all-inclusive and agile data center capability for now -- and the
future. And we have learned how one high-performance digital manufacturing
innovator is leading the charge for bleeding edge IT-as-a-service agility.
Please join
me in thanking our guest, Jeff Wike, CTO of DreamWorks Animation in Glendale,
California.
Wike: Thanks, Dana.
Gardner: And a big thank you to our audience
as well for joining this BriefingsDirect Voice of the Customer digital
transformation success story. I’m Dana Gardner, Principal Analyst at Interarbor
Solutions, your host for this ongoing series of Hewlett Packard Enterprise-sponsored
interviews.
Thanks
again for listening. Feel free to pass this on to your IT community, and do
come back next time.
Listen to the podcast. Find it on iTunes. Get the mobile app. Download the transcript. Sponsor: Hewlett Packard Enterprise.
Transcript
of a discussion on how an innovative entertainment
company leads the charge for multi-purpose IT-as-a-Service capabilities. Copyright Interarbor Solutions, LLC,
2005-2017. All rights reserved.
You may also be
interested in:
- How Imagine Communications Leverages Edge Computing for Efficient Live IP Multiscreen Digital Video
- Hybrid cloud ecosystem readies for impact from arrival of Microsoft Azure Stack
- The next line of defense—How new security leverages virtualization to counter sophisticated threats
- Advanced IoT systems provide analysis catalyst for the petrochemical refinery of the future
- India Smart Cities Mission shows IoT potential for improving quality of life at vast scale
- Converged IoT systems: Bringing the data center to the edge of everything
- Why effective IoT adoption is a team sport, and how to become a player
- How AI, IoT and blockchain will shake up procurement and supply chains
- Logicalis chief technologist defines the new ideology of hybrid IT
- TasmaNet ups its cloud game to deliver a regional digital services provider solution
No comments:
Post a Comment